Talk:Jaruvan Maintaka

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Relationship with Wang Nam Yen?[edit]

The entry claims that Jaruvan had "close relationship" with the controversial Wang Nam Yen faction of the ruling Thai Rak Thai Party. This is the first I have ever heard such an assertion. Although I recall some prominent members of the Wang Nam Yen faction wanted to make Jaruvan's troubles a political issue, I have seen no direct evidence that Jaruvan had a direct political relationship with Wang Nam Yen. If the author of this sentence cannot cite a proper, credible source on this issue, I will delete this sentence. Regards, Tettyan 22:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Patiwat, the article you cited doesn't mention any "close relationship" between Khunying Jaruvan and Wang Nam Yen. It just shows (as we've always known), that Sanoh and some of his followers sought to politicize the Auditor-General issue, but there's no evidence of close coordination with Jaruvan herself on this issue. So far as the news sources tell us, Sanoh initiated the petition campaign on his own initiative. Either find a source that offers evidence of a "close relationship" between Jaruvan and Wang Nam Yen, or I will either (A) delete this reference or (B) dispute the neutrality of this section. Regards, Tettyan 07:25, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done. I have removed the reference to Jaruvan having a "close relationship" to the controversial Wang Nam Yen faction of the Thai Rak Thai Party. If anyone comes up with any clear reference or evidence on this matter, I'd be happy to discuss on this page. Regards, Tettyan 17:57, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Inappropriate image[edit]

The derogatory cartoon is not appropriate at the top of the page, shouldn't there be a photo? You people make me sick. IamYossarian 05:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 20 external links on Jaruvan Maintaka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]