Talk:Iron oxide nanoparticle

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

wrong reference[edit]

could not find the ref in the "Molecular Imaging" journal. Page number does not exists (starts with 1536 in 2011).

Böhm I.A rapid and user-friendly method to quantify the iron content after magnetic cell loading with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles.Molecular Imaging 2011;10:270-277

I couldn't find it with a Google Scholar search either. I have replaced it with another citation. Thanks for pointing this out. RockMagnetist (talk) 16:30, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Nanoworm" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nanoworm. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 15#Nanoworm until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. – bradv🍁 05:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's frustrating that no Wikipedia entry exists for nanoworms (not even a redirect), because scientists aren't prone to defining the word when they use it (and they are still using it); so, it's hard to figure out what they actually are. If there had been a Wikipedia article, we might not have that conspiracy theory about nanoworms today (search for nanoworms on duckduckgo.com to find it prominently featured). Here are some links about nanoworms that I think are sufficient to merit an article, personally:

Yeah, it's not defined very well, but scientists apparently seem to know what it means enough to not bother explaining themselves.

75.174.127.97 (talk) 09:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]