Talk:Interview/Archives/2016

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Emphasis of article

Seems like most of the focus of this article is on only one type of interviewing -- that used in qualitative research; in addition, the material on qualitative research seems to have a huge emphasis on only two non-inline sources (Seidman and Weiss). There are many forms and types of interviewing unrelated to market research and I think the article should be expanded to cover them.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 15:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Agreed. Do please add more material. Bondegezou (talk) 16:13, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
I moved the qualitative research content, pretty much intact, to Interview (research) where I think it properly belongs. The previous version of this article was almost entirely devoted to only one type of interview, that is, qualitative research, and basically only touched on the various other types (employment, psychiatric, etc). So the Interview article has been reworked to reflect this, so that the numerous readers of this particular page, (970/day) who are probably not looking for the specifics of qualitative research interviewing, do not get confused or lost. The references in this this version are not new, but taken from the previous article as well as other articles within Wikipedia and have not been checked.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 18:47, 16 February 2016 (UTC)