Talk:Interstate 5 in California/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Exit List verifications with photos

–PhATxPnOY916 (talk to me) 04:24, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Exit issues again and again

Splat5572 keep adding back Santa Ana and Golden State Freeway samples back to exit list. Either we have one sample on I-5 or we keep those exit list on those two speerate pages. There is not reason to have two reepating exit lists What 63. did is wrote see Golden State Freeway exits 100-200, that tells people where to look up the exit list. Splat5572 did the same thing to US 101 and I-80.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 03:34, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

leaving Santa Ana and Golden State Freeway out of the exit list

As of WT:CASH discussion, Santa Aan and Golden State Freeways should definitely have an exit list, which makes the most sense. So on I-5 exit list, I thik we should just say See Golden State Freeway, which I don't think anything is wrong with it. The problem of duplicating the exit list is people will forget to update it, and we can't that easily copy and paste.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 19:33, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Business Loops

There are more than just two business loops for I-5 in California. I know that there is still signage in the towns of Woodland, CA as well as Arbuckle, California that designate surface streets as I-5 Business Routes. Are the two in the article listed because their loops were considered freeway status? I'm just trying to figure out why those two are the only two in the article since I'm sure there are many more. Killiondude (talk) 02:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

It's because they're the only ones that we (the editors) know of. :P If a whole bunch more are added, then a separate list should be made. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Oh okay. I just found this page which lists all the the I-5 business loops (included Washington and Oregon, but California makes up the majority of the list). There seems to be quite a lot... I don't want to be a stick in the mud or anything but it would seem strange to list only two here when there are so many others (especially since the two listed are decommissioned routes). Killiondude (talk) 03:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

"The Merge (San Diego)" page

I may consider a possibility of a new article about the I-5/I-805 northern junction in San Diego. To Rschen7754: If you approve, please create an article that will feature a history section in which recent improvements and/or major incidents will be included, like:

  • Local Bypass project commencing on February 2002
  • Construction crane collapse on May 2003 that caused a major traffic nightmare everywhere (source)
  • Northbound Local Bypass lanes opening on February 2006
  • Southbound Local Bypass lanes opening on April 2007

AkiStuart (talk) 05:01, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

This could really just be a paragraph on I-5 or I-805 in CA. The crane collapse is probably not notable. --Rschen7754 (T C) 05:34, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Even when the crane collapse severed some overhead power lines (have you read the source I attached?), it is probably not notable? Then what about the El Toro Y? AkiStuart (talk) 14:50, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
El Toro Y probably should not exist either. And no, the crane collapse is not notable. --Rschen7754 (T C) 16:45, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
If that's what you think, have you nominated the El Toro Y for deletion? AkiStuart (talk) 04:23, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
No... because I have other stuff to do? --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Exit list discussion

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads#Fragmented exit lists --Rschen7754 (T C) 22:36, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Merge

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus. – TMF 17:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

  • Oppose to merging Santa Ana Freeway with this article. It has sufficient history to maintain its own article. --Son (talk) 23:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
  • What about Golden State Frwy; I weakly oppose merging it with this article. It have its own history; and too much information to cram it in.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 20:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
  • There was absolutely no consensus for such a merge and it has been reverted. --Oakshade (talk) 05:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
    • This article is mostly redundant; please revert your split. --Rschen7754 (T C) 05:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • This seems to be a bad merge; there's certainly enough history for the Santa Ana Freeway to make it a separate article. Compare, for instance, Cross Bronx Expressway/Interstate 95 in New York. --NE2 01:23, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
    • Right now there's not enough for a separate article though. --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
      • Sure there is... --NE2 07:59, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
        • Just one section though. --Rschen7754 (T C) 08:05, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
  • It would make sense to merge Santa Ana Freeway into Interstate 5 in California (similar to what happened with Golden State Freeway), but the problem is part of it is US 101. Maybe a disambiguation page like San Diego Freeway? Dough4872 (talk) 15:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Don't merge, make it a disambiguation page: Because Santa Ana Freeway comprises Interstate 5 and U.S. Route 101, it would make more sense by making Santa Ana Freeway a disambiguation page such as San Bernardino Freeway. AkiStuart (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Support! The segment of US-101 on the Santa Ana Freeway is only 3 miles long and unsignificant. User:Ultimate Roadgeek 9:08 PTC, April 14,2010 —Preceding undated comment added 04:09, 15 April 2010 (UTC).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

New exit list

I have completed the conversion of the exit list to use {{Jctint}}. The result is here, in my sandbox. I forked it last year, so can someone look over it for errors? Thanks. -happy5214 09:36, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Probably the easiest thing to do is to go through and convert a few exits at a time into the article, and look for differences. --Rschen7754 19:08, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Went ahead and overwrote the old one. --Rschen7754 04:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Interstate 5 in California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:24, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

File:I5 Mexico border.JPG

This picture looks like it was actually taken on I-805 just before it merges with the 5 prior to the border.[1]. The signage on I-5 for the Camino De La Plaza exit is instead this and this. Zzyzx11 (talk) 07:59, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Interstate 5 in California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:48, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Interstate_5_in_California/Archive_1&oldid=1136822323"