Talk:Infantry Regiment Großdeutschland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Otto Ernst Remer and July 20 plot[edit]

How about the roles of Otto Ernst Remer in the July 20 plot?-- Matthead discuß!     O       19:42, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Images[edit]

Cuffti3.gifBetacommandBot 23:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cuffti.gifBetacommandBot 23:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cuffti.gifBetacommandBot (talk) 20:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cuffti3.gifBetacommandBot (talk) 20:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Solved, as the article doesn´t use said gifs anymore ... GELongstreet (talk) 20:31, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pancevo[edit]

Hi, I would like to reword this paragraph, to clarify that the reference/source describes the events in Pancevo. Right now the paragraph is structured in such a way that the ref seems to support the statement that "...film of the executions were used decades after the event to help chronicle the Wehrmacht's complicity..."

Original:
On 22 April 1941, soldiers of the Infantry Regiment Grossdeutschland committed a war crime in the town cemetery of Pančevo when 35 men and one woman were executed as a reprisal for the deaths of four German soldiers. Propaganda photos and film of the executions were used decades after the event to help chronicle the Wehrmacht's complicity in German atrocities during the war.[1]
Suggested:
On 22 April 1941, soldiers of the Infantry Regiment Grossdeutschland committed a war crime in the town cemetery of Pančevo when 35 men and one woman were executed as a reprisal for the deaths of four German soldiers.[1]

This is clearer.

Thoughts? K.e.coffman (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit[edit]

Preserving here by providing this link. My rationale was: "non RS & not used for citations; excessive and uncited orbat; excessive intricate detail". Please let me know if there are any concerns. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]