Talk:Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 09:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why are people scared of my posting.....???[edit]

--222.67.209.251 (talk) 14:01, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks that my clones are chasing me again for the time being --222.64.19.136 (talk) 14:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See more info for the nomenclature from the above link --222.64.19.136 (talk) 14:44, 20 June 2010 (UTC) The following sentence contains an error: "A peristaltic pump delivers an aqueous or organic sample into a nebulizer where it is atomized and introduced directly inside the plasma flame." Sample is not "atomized" in nebulizer. The molecules are still intact going from nebulizer to plasma where atomization (breaking molecules)and ionization takes place. The word "atomized" should be replaced by "changed into mist" or "evaporated". Adamstefan (talk) 17:02, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:03, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion between OES and AES[edit]

In Australia, I have never come across ICP-AES. I have worked in the mineral assay and agriculture laboratories, and we have always called the machines ICP-OES. The manufacturers also name them ICP-OES. The start of the article says they refer to the same thing, but later in the article is says they have different applications. The references to AES and OES produces a lot of confusion. If they do refer to different variations of a similar technology can someone please write it, or have a new section with a list of which country the technology is most commonly called? DeanLeggo (talk) 02:19, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]