Talk:Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Currently identified problems[edit]

  • Copyright violations; I've removed one section already and there are more that require checking
  • Content not in source: e.g. "The Post-Graduate Programme in Agribusiness Management (PGP-ABM) is a two-year fully residential management programme." -- the linked source doesn't mention anything about this
  • Primary sources and poor quality press releases: Contentious and flowery content sourced to the institute's website.
  • Neutrality: Reuse of press releases doesn't give a story, instead it presents disjointed statements (e.g. the architecture section)
  • Scope: The article is very limited in scope and reads more like a PowerPoint presentation and does not cover any of the listed titles in a proper manner.

These issues would mean a quick fail at GAN, but I'm bringing it here to see if it can be fixed instead of being delisted. —SpacemanSpiff 18:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the link about PGP-ABM now known as PGP-FABM, the official site has not yet changed the name everywhere.Esperanza 1409 (talk) 22:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC) [1][reply]

This article does not deserve GA status. It is being continuously disrupted by IP promotional edits from IIMA itself. Sigmabaroda (talk) 03:56, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

  • Here's an assessment based on the criteria:
  1. Well written: Red XN
    • Disjointed sections, no flow within the article, found some copyvios, there may be more.
  2. Verifiable with no original research: Red XN
    • Mostly primary sources, press releases; a lot of unsourced content.
  3. Broad in its coverage: Red XN
    • Weak on history, organizational structure, location/architecture etc while heavy on recent news.
  4. Neutral: Red XN
    • Not neutral as sections are used to promote a certain point of view.
  5. Stable: Red XN
    • Unstable with constant back and forth between multiple points of view.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by images:Green tickY
    • Reasonable use of images, properly licensed.

Based on the above assessment I'm delisting the article. —SpacemanSpiff 12:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]