Talk:Index of law articles

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indexes

This alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical indexes on Wikipedia.IndexesWikipedia:WikiProject IndexesTemplate:WikiProject IndexesIndexes articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Lie#Fabrication|Fabricate]] The anchor (#Fabrication) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Format[edit]

Aside from the space it would take, is there some reason that such an index must be formatted as it now stands? The list, with hyphens between entries, is very hard to read and as such, isn't of much use for anyone with vision that is not perfect.

Proposal[edit]

Re-format the index in a bulleted list style for better readability. Thoughts and comments please.

Merge proposal-[edit]

The following article should be merged here after the entries are culled:

All the redlinks should be removed since they are obviously not articles. Also there are many superfluous entries - for example: abandon, abate, acceleration, calendar. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:10, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, except that redlinks should be moved here, to the talk page, where they can be monitored. The links can be added to the index as they turn blue. The Transhumanist 11:33, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By WP:NC, article names are supposed to be nouns, not adjectives. There are many instances on this list where both the adjectival and nominal forms of the same term appear; the adjectives should be deleted (redlink or not), unless they actually link to an existing law-related article that is different from the article that the noun links to. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 16:13, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Items removed[edit]

Per the above discussion, I've been bold and removed a bunch of items that do not appear to be links to "law articles." If any of these are in error, feel free to reinstate them. Also, I do not claim that all of the items that need to be removed have been, by any means. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 18:54, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages[edit]

Redlinks[edit]

Miscellaneous[edit]

Most of these don't link to where you would expect based on the text.

Item replaced[edit]

I have put Semble back into the index as it is no longer redlinked. James500 (talk) 08:52, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RfC[edit]

BAn RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 16:47, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]