Talk:Inception/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GamerPro64 23:31, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
After reading the article, I'm afraid that I will have to fail it. In the article, there is a {{Citation Needed}}, a {{Expand section}} template in the Marketing section, as well as reformation required for Top ten lists. Also, I would like to mention that the nominator has not made any recent edits in the article before the nomination. GamerPro64 19:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- Ooof, might have held it while I made some changes, but I guess that's fair enough. Thanks for reviewing it. I do feel I should ask what you mean by no recent articles pre-nom? For one, why does that strike you as necessary? For two, it's not quite true... in the past week (before nom) I've created 6 articles...? #Scratches head.# I'm probably misunderstanding everything. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 19:36, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry. Change sentence. GamerPro64 20:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC)