Talk:InMediaRes Productions

Is a merge appropriate?

Catalyst Game Labs and InMediaRes are in effect the same company. Both articles combined would show a greater history, allow for more references, etc, then one article. The question is, would this be an appropriate merger? Since it is a business and not just related topics, I am holding off adding a merger tag for now. Turlo Lomon 11:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Well, CGL is owned by IMR, but that does not make them the same company. IMR also owns Battlecorps.com and the forthcoming Holostreets.com. I can understand your point about the merger, since there is not a lot of information for either company, but if we did merge the articles, which would get merged into which? I'm not sure I'd be happy with it either way. Scaletail 12:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

As the parent company, I believe IMR should be the parent article, with redirects from the others to here. Turlo Lomon 12:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

That seems like a reasonable proposal, as InMediaRes does not appear to have sufficient sources to demonstrate notability. --Gavin Collins 14:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

I would be in favour of a merger. As I understand it Catalyst Game Labs is a division (as opposed to a subsidiary) of InMediaRes. Battlecorps.com, and Holostreets.com are both simply projects run by InMediaRes, although I do not know if they are considered to be under Catalyst or alongside it.

Either way, all four should probably be covered here. —MJBurrage^(T•C) 06:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on InMediaRes Productions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060830071647/http://www.shadowrunrpg.com:80/wordpress/?p=66 to http://www.shadowrunrpg.com/wordpress/?p=66

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on InMediaRes Productions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828082209/http://www.holostreets.com/ to http://www.holostreets.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)