Talk:Imagination age

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources[edit]

I have my doubts about this article and have therefore tagged it for cleanup. My particular concern is the lack of good sources to verify that this term is not just a neologism. A Google search doesn't seem to reveal much in the way of reliable sources. Astronaut (talk) 21:19, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I have since added three more sources, from different domains. As for reliable sources this is a bit strange. Imagination Age is a term used by some people for talking about the economy and the future, its not a mineral or a state in Africa but a term. A Google search should only show the the term is in fact being used or not and if so is it being used in line with the entry.

I acutally held off for about a year to make this entry until enough references to the term proved to me that it was a an emerging concept and not just a buzz word. I would ask you not speed this to delete over the upcoming holidays when I shall not have the hours to figure out Wikipeida reference rules and to collect more solid references.

--Rober1236jua (talk) 21:19, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have extended the references to this article including references to published books and Fortune Magazine and therefore feel confident to remove the sources. I actually believe it is a neologism but fail to see how in something like Wikipedia this is really a problem.

Rober1236jua (talk) 13:57, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


It is now been almost a year since I produced this article and the term's use, as part of Google search I admit, is increasing. Over 7,000 sources last I checked. I think the neologism tag can be taken down. Though I leave that to the judgment of others.

Rober1236jua (talk) 10:48, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article provides a variety of references and is well written to understand the topics depths. It was easy to access links to the references and I found it worthwhile to visit original sources just to dive a little deeper.

The neutrality of the article was will presented as it offered an equilibrium of different opinions, yet remained balanced as a whole. I personally enjoyed reading about what other people have thought throughout the years and found it extremely beneficial to my understanding of the Imagination Age. Tmercado98 (talk) 04:18, 5 April 2018 (UTC)tmercado98[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:54, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]