Talk:Hydrophis belcheri

	Hydrophis belcheri is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that an image or images be included in this article to improve its quality.

needs how much venomous=yes

Untitled[edit]

What color is Hydrophis belcheri? Why can I not find any images of it on the Internet and no descriptions of it on the Internet? The two references listed are a magazine article and a CD-ROM? Cannot find them anywhere either.

According to wikipedia, the Hydrophis Belcheri is the poisonous snake in the world. Then why everybody hasn't accepted it yet?Why haven't the others, like animal planet etc. edited their list of poisonous snakes?They still think that Inland Taipan is the poisonous snake in world.So is there anything that we can do to tell them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackhawk y2k316 (talk • contribs) 08:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blackhawk y2k316: To start with, Hydrophis belcheri is venomous, not poisonous. Secondly, unless you have hard evidence to the contrary, the Inland Taipan is actually the world’s most venomous snake (as supported by its incredibly low LD₅₀ value in mice). ChristopherJRex (talk) 18:22, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LD50[edit]

Isn't is 0.24 μg/kg , not 0.24 mg/kg ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.188.7.198 (talk) 20:04, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The reported value in the literature was in the form of 0.24 ug/g, which can be re-stated as the more widely used unit, 0.24 mg/kg. Note: ug/g equals (1x10^-6g)/g ; mg/kg equals (1x10^-3g)/(1x10³g). Either way, there is a 1x10^-6 "gap" between the upper and lower values. ChristopherJRex (talk) 04:09, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion[edit]

This article is way too short and is missing important information on the species, including information on it's venom , taxonomy, and behavior, the latter of which is missing information on the snake's diet, and reproduction. There is also no citations in the article's main body and needs to have proper footnotes added. The infobox also needs to be expanded and images of the species added to the article's infobox and in the article's main body. This is probably the worst article on a major animal species on this site and there is a lot of work that needs to be done to this article with the additions and fixes already listed needing to be done in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's standards and guidelines of a well developed and properly sourced article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 18:49, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hydrophis belcheri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:41, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]