Talk:Horn (anatomy)

Untitled

Since added in. --Richard New Forest (talk) 17:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Antelope's horn

Antelope's horn(ling yang jiao) is used in traditional chinese medicine for fever. The horn is scraped into paper like stripes with a metal rule(or similar) and boiled in water. --165.21.155.9 23:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

I added the info to the article.Steve Dufour 03:18, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

This statement is biased, according to whom is this true PETA,etc, etc. Use of animal horns is controversial, especially if the animal was specifically hunted for the horn as a hunting trophy or object of decoration or utility. Some animals are threatened or endangered to reduced populations partially from pressures of such hunting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.129.197.73 (talk) 08:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Moose

Meese have antlers, don't they? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.202.67.252 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 2 January 2007

Yes, they are members of the deer family. Steve Dufour 03:15, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Rhinoceros horn

someone edited the rhinosauros and i dont know if i should edit it back or not. 89.240.240.33 02:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

It's not hair at all. But every time I delete the bit about it being hair someone puts it back in again. I'll try and find a reference --ChaosSorcerer91 15:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

irish horn

i am looking for an explanation what "irish horn" actually is. can anyone add that to the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.159.145.43 (talk) 19:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

human horn

There is a documentd case of a human (named wong i think) who had a horn growing from the back of his head. i think theres a picture of it in some of the ripleys books.♠♦Д narchistPig♥♣ (talk) 05:22, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, there are quite a few photos (some fairly recent ones) circulating on the internet that show human beings with horns growing out of the head. The paper by Tubbs is inaccurate and, I would argue, poorly researched.--Patriotic dissent (talk) 03:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Material

Wouldn't it be nice to have some practical information about horn as a material? Various strengths, hardness, water absorption, thermal expansion, even for one or two types. DCDuring (talk) 12:54, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Request for information

Is it true that all horned animals do not have canine teeth?Lestrade (talk) 15:26, 17 July 2009 (UTC)Lestrade

See Bovidae, which says that there are lower canines, but no upper ones. I've never noticed them in the mouths of sheep or cattle, but this seems to be because they look like incisors. See this page (lower two photos). Richard New Forest (talk) 17:22, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Looking in more detail at that ref, there seems to be disagreement as to whether the outer pair of teeth at the front of the lower jaw are canines or a further pair of incisors. Richard New Forest (talk) 18:07, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

If all horned animals universally lack canine teeth, isn't it reasonable to conclude that horns are merely redirected teeth?Lestrade (talk) 16:12, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Lestrade

Not sure what you mean by "redirected". There is no such developmental process, but in adaptational terms the two could have similar functions, so when horns developed the need for functional canines would be removed, and they would become more useful as a further pair of incisors. Richard New Forest (talk) 21:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

By "redirected" I mean that, instead of growing in the mouth, they grew on top of the head.Lestrade (talk) 04:19, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Lestrade

As I said, there is no such developmental process. Teeth are teeth, and horns are horns. They have different developmental origins, different structures and are made of different materials. Teeth can develop into horn-like structures – but then they are tusks; they are still made of ivory not horn, and they always originate in the jaw like ordinary teeth even if they grow in a different direction. Richard New Forest (talk) 11:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Yet where there are horns, there are no upper canine teeth and where there are upper canine teeth, there are no horns. According to Leibniz's Principle of Sufficient Reason, there must be some relationship.Lestrade (talk) 16:40, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Lestrade

Philosophy is not necessarily a good guide to science – very many things in nature have no reason... If you must have a reason, the natural selection one I gave above is perfectly sufficient; there is no reason to imagine anything further. Richard New Forest (talk) 20:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

It may be a bit more complicated. An animal whose diet changes from being carnivorous to herbivorous will no longer require canine teeth. The horns that develop will therefore not be a replacement for the vanished incisor canine teeth because nothing will be needed to tear flesh. Only biting and grinding teeth will be needed. My reference to Leibniz's principle was merely meant to be a way of saying that an observer would expect that there is a cause of the simultaneous, seemingly coincidental, replacement of incisor canine teeth by horns. Also, it seems significant that the upper canine teeth are the only teeth that become elongated in the case of elephants, walruses, and sabre–toothed tigers. Those are the very teeth whose absence is associated with the presence of horns. They are the teeth that display evolutionary variance. Lestrade (talk) 20:32, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Lestrade

I think you meant "canine" all the way through, not sometimes "incisor". However, in fact evolution is not as limited as that – the elongated teeth that form tusks are not always upper canines. In pigs they are both upper and lower canines, in elephants they are both upper and (in some prehistoric species) lower incisors, in hippopotamuses upper and lower canines and incisors, and in narwhals the single tusk is a left upper incisor. Many herbivores do retain long canines – for example fruit bats, pandas, and most primates (not one of the more carnivorous ones though: us...).

Not really sure what the difference is between my sufficient reason and yours. I suppose the real point is that natural selection can only work with what already exists. I don't think horns ever replace canines directly. The process is much more likely to be that at some stage in the animal's history canines are not needed and so are lost (as in horses) or become ordinary teeth (as in ruminants). Then at some later point there is an evolutionary advantage to having some kind of weapon, commonly for fighting between males. Such a weapon then evolves from whatever the animal happens to have now – perhaps the canines again, or incisors, or knobs on the head (horns, antlers), knobs on the legs (as in the spurs of platypuses) or no doubt many others I can't think of at the moment. Very many animals of course do without any weapon altogether, or use unspecialised organs such as their ordinary claws and teeth. Richard New Forest (talk) 09:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for correcting my careless failure to use the "strike" option. I still think, à la Leibniz, that there must be a sufficient reason why every animal that has horns is also an animal that does not have canine teeth. Coincidences are uninstructive. There may be something like a genetic allele that acts like a toggle switch. When the canine tooth is toggled on, the horn is toggled off, and vice versa.Lestrade (talk) 20:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Lestrade

Now that is something that would need a reason to exist! A gene switch like that would have to evolve and be maintained, and could only do so if there was an evolutionary benefit throughout the history of the animal. How could the potential for horns in the future benefit an animal with tusks or canines now? It could not, and so such a gene could not be maintained, and this is not a possible scenario. Genetic "toggle switches" do exist in nature (for example swarming in locusts, or sexual reproduction in aphids, or indeed sex differentiation in very many organisms), but they benefit the organisms in every generation, or at least every few generations. The mechanism I suggested above is a perfectly sufficient reason without invoking time-travel magic.

In any case, as I said above, it's much more likely that there would be a very long gap between the loss of one feature and the development of another.

Actually I can't think of any examples of tusks developing after the loss of horns or antlers, though I also can't think of a reason why that should not happen. Teeth are more universal I suppose, so there are more animals to have lost them. Richard New Forest (talk) 12:02, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Is it possible to make the following statement with certainty: "Every existing horned ruminant does not have upper canine teeth"? If so, then what is the relation between the presence of horns and the absence of upper canine teeth? There must be a relation that can be mentioned in the article. Not to "put words in his mouth," but Richard New Forest might claim that there is no relation and that the situation is merely coincidental.Lestrade (talk) 17:45, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Lestrade

Didn't we deal with all this before? Ruminants do not have upper incisor teeth either, and so the same question could be asked about that. Or paws, or fins, or all sorts of other things they don't happen to have. I don't think it is relevant to the article, except that horns and tusks can both be used in similar ways. Richard New Forest (talk) 22:53, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Unhorned ruminants have upper canine teeth. Paws and fins (and feathers, scales, bills, gills, etc., etc.) are not similar to horns. (Horns) X (Upper Canine Teeth) = 0.Lestrade (talk) 23:10, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Lestrade

According to the Canine tooth article, the maxillary, or upper, canines have the deepest roots in the head. The Maxillary canine article states that they are the longest teeth. Having the deepest roots, they begin to grow more toward the upper part of the head. Being longest, they are more horn–like. Both of these characteristics make it more likely that maxillary (upper) canine teeth have evolved into horns in many ruminants, especially given the fact that upper canine teeth are always absent when horns are present.Lestrade (talk) 01:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC)Lestrade

Yes, but see above: teeth are teeth, horns are horns, and one does not, has not and could not evolve into the other. Don't confuse form and function. Richard New Forest (talk) 21:04, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

i have a ram...

i have a ram... i want idea how to grow the horn of him.. his horn is very small as compair to other ram of same age.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.119.220.204 (talk) 10:14, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Horned gopher

I wonder why these animals aren't mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirkekol (talk • contribs) 16:15, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Male impala profile.jpg to appear as POTD

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Male impala profile.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 20, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-12-20. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:13, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the day

A portrait of a male impala, showing its horns. Horns consist of bone cores surrounded by a covering of keratin and other proteins, and are often curved or spiral in shape. Most horned animal species have one pair, though some may have more.Photograph: Muhammad Mahdi Karim

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Horn (anatomy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110509222112/http://www.stern.de/wissen/mensch/ungewoehnliche-operation-aerzte-befreien-frau-von-horn-1682189.html to http://www.stern.de/wissen/mensch/ungewoehnliche-operation-aerzte-befreien-frau-von-horn-1682189.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

What is a Boss?

I ran into a sentence in a book mentioning a boss, in connection to a horned animal. I've so far found Merriam-Webster confirms that there is something called a boss on or near the horns of an animal "1 a : a protuberant part or body • a boss of granite • a boss on an animal's horn," and while I think I can guess what it is from that, I'm mystified by my inability to find other information on the internet. Specifically, it seems like a drawing, breaking down the parts of a horn, and the appropriate nomenclature, in this article would be a great benefit, and would help fill a void on horn information that doesn't seem easily found elsewhere on the internet.

Thoughts? Help? Thanks! 68.65.37.10 (talk) 18:49, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

I have heard the term used to describe the part where an African buffalo's horns meet in the middle to form a sort of hard cap on top of their head. I don't know which if any other species have a "boss". 121.98.70.28 (talk) 13:09, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

"The erect penis is sometimes referred to in slang use as a "horn", but it normally contains no keratin"

Incorrect, all human skin contains keratin. See stratum corneum -121.98.70.28 (talk) 13:13, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

How horns are formed

I was looking for information on how horns are formed (cells) but could not find it in this article. If someone has the knowledge and would like to add this, that would be greatly appreciated. Timelezz (talk) 22:24, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Dehorning

The dehorning section describes dehorning as "similar to cutting toenails" and only links to dehorning rhinos. As mentioned in an above section, rhino "horns" have no live bone (or any bone) and is only keratin. I feel there should either be more references to non-rhino dehorning; having the section removed; or iterating that rhino "horns" lack bone (unlike the other true horned animals) Ktarre (talk) 22:23, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Not all horns are called horns.

Perhaps this should be noted? 146.200.180.251 (talk) 20:44, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

What are the characteristics of animal horn

What are the characteristics of animal horn 105.113.20.159 (talk) 14:35, 12 February 2023 (UTC)