Talk:Hogettes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHogettes has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 2, 2007Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 15, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the Hogettes (pictured), a group of Washington Redskins fans who dress in drag and wear pig snout masks, have collected over US$100 million for charity since 1983?

Prod[edit]

It's a new article still in development. Notability isn't an issue. The history and origin sections are being worked on as I type this by another editor. The lead will be next. It will be good and within Wikipedia's inclusion standards. We work with GAs and FAs daily, so trust that we know what we're doing. Thank you. LaraLove 01:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To-do[edit]

  • Expand the philanthropy section.
  • Create section about various commercial ads they've done.
    • I can only find a reference for the VISA ad. There are forums that mention a Home Depot ad and there are references that state "commercials" but give no further information.
  • Talk about the treatment they have received throughout the years.
  • Write the lead. Thanks for your help Jayron.
  • Waiting to hear back from them regarding free licensing of image(s).

LaraLove 05:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Current members list[edit]

Maybe they should be listed by birth name first, then by Hogette name second? What about doing this as a table? That may be easier to follow... Ideas? --Jayron32|talk|contribs 06:39, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I thought because the article is about the Hogettes, their Hogette names should go first. I will make a table. What do you think about a column for their Hogette name emboldened, with a column for real name or birth name, a column for when they joined and one for any additional info, like Hall of Fans? I can put the real names first and have the hog names emboldened. We'll play around with it. LaraLove 19:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It might be one of those things where I have to see it to make a decision. Maybe drop a few versions in and we'll look at them? --Jayron32|talk|contribs 02:31, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just looked at the table. This one looks fine.--Jayron32|talk|contribs 02:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about Grandpa Hogette? Member 1983? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.240.142.195 (talk) 18:38, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never heard of him. Nothing in the sources. If you've got a source for him, feel free add it to the article or here on the talk page. لennavecia 20:06, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grandpa Hogette: One of the originals just passed away. Please add him. http://www.tbd.com/articles/2010/08/redskins-fan-ralph-campbell-aka-grandpa-hogette-remembered--6535.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.168.25.203 (talk) 17:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Novel info in the lead[edit]

We'll need to put more in the article to cover the time they were attacked at the Vet. Perhaps under the "national exposure" section. That section needs some work anyways; it needs some expandsion and may need a new title. Now that I see it in print, it just seems like it needs more work. Any ideas? --Jayron32|talk|contribs 02:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, I'm not done with it or the charity sections. I just takes me forever. Writers block. I'm not good at wording things from scratch. I'm more about tweaking prose. I've got the links above in the to-do section, and I'm looking for more information. LaraLove 02:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hogettes on the Food Network[edit]

More for national exposure. See: [1] and [2] We'll need more than these before its added, but its a start. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 06:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was a forums site that mentioned a Home Depot commercial, but I can't find anything on it. LaraLove 14:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Pass[edit]

1. Well written?: checkY As all of LaraLove's works are, it is extremely well written at a professional level.
2. Factually accurate?: checkY
3. Broad in coverage?: checkY
4. Neutral point of view?: checkY
5. Article stability? checkY
6. Images?: checkY Looked over them, they seem to be good.

Pass?  Done. Interesting article, well written, and well referenced. Good job and congratulations! ✗iℎi✗(talk) 20:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WHOO-HOO! --Jayron32|talk|contribs 02:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

necessary?[edit]

Is a page on the hogettes really necessary? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.0.40.26 (talk) 14:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 06:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes.Jwalte04 06:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, but it doesn't need to be. Soul schizm (talk) 15:06, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent news[edit]

I'll work this in soon:

لennavecia 03:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hogettes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]