Talk:History of poker in print

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Poker#Early books discussing poker]] The anchor (#Early books discussing poker) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Merge discussion[edit]

We already have a nicely sourced History of poker. This article would fit nicely as a section of that existing article, and does not appear to require its own article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support. There is no reason to fragment miniscule aspects from the main article. History of poker can easily accommodate much more development before any rationale WP:SPLITting is warranted. --Animalparty-- (talk) 00:35, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support, as above. 2005 (talk) 04:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not so sure this is a valid merge after all. As I examine the article, it is full of unsourced claims. I will contact the author to see if these claims are verifiable. If not, this article might better be deleted. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support merging essay. "History of poker in print" alone is non-notable. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree with merge; it can be disputed and even deleted on the target if that is preferred; I've also simplified the text to a list in order for it to work better in the existing history section (which is based on texts, not surprisingly). Done Klbrain (talk) 21:53, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]