Talk:History of metamaterials

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

References!!!! Ahchtung![edit]

Why do people copy-paste refs without checking? Lets see the Pafomov's case: JETP 36 1321 (1959) Are you sure? Maybe JETP 9 1321 (1959), or JETP 36 1853 (1959) ? Can anyone confirm? P.S. This is not phys rev journal, you can leave the actual title in the reference here. Even in Russian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.48.109.18 (talk) 14:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on History of metamaterials. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is a metamaterial? Why is there not an article that explains this?[edit]

This article would be fine as a companion to a metamaterial article, but as the only article that attempts to unify the individual articles on various types of metamaterials, IMO it's very disappointing. What's a metamaterial? Who cares? Let's talk about the history of an undefined term for several whole sections before giving a simplistic one-sentence definition! The fact that the intro is IMHO poorly written in addition to failing to provide the reader with any inkling of what it's providing a history of just makes the article all the more frustrating. -- Ataru (talk) 17:58, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]