Talk:History of Manchester

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Population[edit]

How about some specific numbers about the rate of Manchester's growth during the Industrial Revolution. I know for a fact it skyrocketed but I didn't see any numbers when skimming through the article. [anon ]

Image[edit]

manufactures plate off a steam locomotive in Perth Western Australia. I surprised that there no mention of the building of rail equipment in the article. There were a number of different manufactures plates on the museum pieces mostly from Manchester Gnangarra 01:58, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the civil war in Manchester, The Earl of Derby, (Lord Strange) may have been beaten back by the weather - there is speculation that the Irwell River flooded into his powder supplies and rendered them useless. Though Manchester was not attacked directly again in the Civil war, its garrison was used repeatedly in the campaigns. 'Manchester Men' had a fierce reputation on the field, and Thomas Fairfax was briefly stationed in Manchester to lead them. Manchester Men helped to bring about the end of the Royalist hold on Nantwich in 1644. (User:arthurchappell

Not sure where to put this[edit]

we might find it worth mentioning the extent of the ancient parish of Manchester, which included apart from the core parish, Manchester Our Lady, St George and St Denys, also the chapelries/townships (40 altogether) of

Blackley Chorlton cum Hardy Denton Didsbury Gorton Newton Salford Stretford Ardwick Bradford Broughton Burnage Cheetham Crumpsall Harpurhey Haughton Heaton Norris Hulme Levenshulme Moss Side Moston Openshaw Reddish Rusholme Withington

notably, this contains some areas which are now part of the boroughs of Trafford, Tameside, Stockport and Salford.

Morwen - Talk 06:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is now covered by a para in the Post Roman section.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 09:46, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Back Piccadilly c.1939.JPG[edit]

Image:Back Piccadilly c.1939.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:07, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Manchesterbomb-devestation.jpg[edit]

Image:Manchesterbomb-devestation.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:44, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chetham's Library[edit]

Re Chetham's Library as first public library: have taken this out of the introductory text as other public libraries did precede it. Chetham's Library is now the oldest surviving public library in the UK.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 07:20, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Medical schools[edit]

The statement about the school of anatomy needs a reference. Thompson, Joseph; The Owens College, 1886 gives an account of a failure to combine medical schools with the college in 1856 (pp. 149-52). The establishment of the Medical School was in 1872 and it moved to the same site as the rest of the college in 1874.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 21:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This has now been removed: "which immediately absorbed the Mount Street School of Anatomy, founded in 1814, the first medical school in England outside Oxford, Cambridge and London"[citation needed]" The school was conducted by Joseph Jordan between 1814 and 1834 when he retired. In 1824 Thomas Turner founded the Manchester School of Medicine in Pine Street with courses in anatomy, physiology, pathology, materia medica, surgery, midwifery and botany. "The fact that the Manchester School was the first fully equipped medical school in the provinces was recognised in 1836 in official circles, and the compliment paid of the Royal Patronage being extended to it, with the title of the Manchester Royal School of Medicine." (E. M. Brockbank)[1]
  1. ^ Brockbank, E. M. "History of collegiate teaching", in: The Book of Manchester and Salford. Manchester: George Falkner & Sons, 1929; pp. 42-61

--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 08:34, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion - New Article Barons of Manchester[edit]

Anyone out there wish to help create an article about the Barons of Manchester?

--PL.-Snr (talk) 23:41, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bomb triggering regeneration[edit]

I realise that this is a commonly-held idea, but it's also quite contentious and by no means universally agreed. Without a decent reference I don't think this point is strong enough to belong in the opening. So I'm amending it. pomegranate (talk) 14:54, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Manchester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on History of Manchester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:31, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Manchester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beetham Tower Image[edit]

The caption on the Beetham Tower image states it is the tallest building in Manchester, which is no longer the case as the south tower of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deansgate_Square has now surpassed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4B00:E404:B200:9406:5B8F:4258:6B10 (talk) 22:55, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_Manchester&oldid=1198913733"