This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WikiProject Constructed languagesconstructed language articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
more sources on ease of learning of more or less "naturalistic" auxlangs?[edit]
Was any study done on comparative ease of learning of more and less "naturalistic" (in the auxlang-ology sense) auxlangs for monolingual people whose native language is unrelated to the auxlangs source languages? E.g., did [Edward Thorndike]] study the relative ease of Esperanto and Occidental for native speakers of Japanese or some other non-European language? If so, can we get a cite on that one way or another? Thorndike's study is mentioned in this article, but no cite for it is given. --Jim Henry (talk) 19:16, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
