Talk:Hide and Q

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHide and Q has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHide and Q is part of the Star Trek: The Next Generation (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 20, 2012Good article nomineeListed
August 10, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 20, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Maurice Hurley was credited for writing the Star Trek: The Next Generation episode "Hide and Q" under a pseudonym in protest against Gene Roddenberry's numerous rewrites?
Current status: Good article

Tenth or Ninth[edit]

Are we sure of the episode numbering? 136.32.62.205 (talk) 05:24, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, it should have been 10. I fixed it. --Fru1tbat (talk) 14:11, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article intro says tenth but the Infobox says 9.
The episode list at Star Trek: The Next Generation (season 1) says it is episode 10. The previous episode is currently listed as 9 and the next episode is currently listed as 11. I think it I can safely also correct the Infobox to say this is episode 10. -- 109.78.194.208 (talk) 06:44, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hide and Q/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 05:08, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • You'll need to note that this is part of the first season of the series.
  • The lead should be expanded a little to include more background information about the episode. I like the way people are writing up the articles on The Office with a note about where its broadcast, some brief background on the show, the subplots, and a little more detail about critic responses.
  • I think that's done. I had based it on the Office episodes but had missed out a couple of the elements. Miyagawa (talk) 14:03, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • In Production: "...proved to be a turning point for the series in how scripts were produced." -- how was this?
  • The article should note the next time de Lancie returns to reprise the role of Q.
  • In "Reception," there's no information about the market share or viewership of the episode when it first aired.
  • Next Gen broadcast directly into syndication, so there's no readily available sources for the numbers of viewers. Miyagawa (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • You mention the guest actors in the infobox, but their roles there are not cited. Would be best if you added the roles next to the names in the "Production" section.
  • "Star Trek: The Next Generation actor Wil Wheaton reviewed the episode for the Huffington Post..." when did this review take place? Obviously after the series ended.
  • Modified the line to explain that. Miyagawa (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dup link tool returns two results: "Q (Star Trek)" and "Star Trek: The Original Series."
  • Dab links shows no disambiguations. Checklink tool returns no errors with external links.
I am placing the article on hold pending the above comments. —Ed!(talk) 05:17, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Great work here too. Passing GA. —Ed!(talk) 00:04, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hide and Q. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant photo[edit]

Is it just me or does anyone else think that the image of Marina Sirtis is offtopic? She was cut from multiple episodes, it wasn't anything in particular about this episode. By the end of the season she was left wondering if she was coming back (but the Crosby and McFadden left, and Rodennbery liked Sirtis so it worked out). That it isn't specifically relevant to this episode is it? I'd suggest another picture, such as of John de Lancie, or no picture at all. -- 109.78.194.208 (talk) 06:57, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed 2001:9E8:4612:7300:B578:229F:D82:21DA (talk) 12:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]