Talk:Harada House

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Southern California Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Onelove10288, Masepulveda, Shanewolf38. Peer reviewers: Myninjanate, Ferrarix5a.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Planned contributions[edit]

Considering that this house marks the site of a landmark case decision regarding California land laws, I believe it would be appropriate to provide a description of the actual case, California v. Harada, as well as a mention of the precedents the case set for future challenges to legal property in California. Additional detail which could be added to the article are further descriptions of the life of the Haradas and their move to the U.S. I've compiled a list of possible sources that could help with some of these additions:

Possible sources

https://www.nps.gov/subjects/aapiheritage/upload/Harada_House.pdf

https://npgallery.nps.gov/pdfhost/docs/NHLS/Text/77000325.pdf

https://www.nps.gov/nr/travel/asian_american_and_pacific_islander_heritage/Harada-House.htm

http://articles.latimes.com/2007/sep/04/local/me-harada4

(Peer Review) I agree that you should add the appropriate court case regarding the article, since it gives a deeper understanding of how Harada House came to be. You might want to consider adding the current state of the House beyond the article's latest mention of the 2004 handover of the House, as well as adding more illustrative images that can give the readers a visual aid of how the house looked in the past and in the present. Ferrarix5a (talk) 00:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]