Talk:HVDC BorWin3
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Germany may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Merge[edit]
Not long enough or notable enough. Makes more sense to be one big article with sections for 1, 2 and 3. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 01:47, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
I don't agree - most HVDC projects have their own unique Wikipedia pages, and these offshore HVDC projects are bigger and more complex than normal (some costing over 1B€). Moreover, all three projects in this group have significant technical differences (Borwin1 being radically different from the other two) and are built by two different manufacturers. In my opinion they either need to stay as separate articles or to combine all 9 of the German offshore HVDC projects (from the Dolwin, Helwin, Sylwin and Borwin clusters) into a single article.Clampower (talk) 19:10, 29 April 2015 (UTC)