Talk:Grumman OV-1 Mohawk/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Specs as stated for OV-1D are seemingly incorrect.

From C.E.Sasser.
Previously OV-1 Mohawk Crew chief, SP/5, US Army, 131st Aviation Co (SAC) MOS 67H20.

Though it has been a few years, I served these birds for 9 years (1968 to 1977)in all capacities from PM maintenance to Ejection seat Service and Modification.

The one thing that prominently jumps out at me in this article is the engine model and shaft horsepower reported.

To the best of my memory the OV-1D was powered by the Lycoming T53-L-701 Powerplant producing an advertised shaft horsepower of 1400. The mentioned T53-L-7 was used in the shorter winged OV-1A Camera/Gun platform and the OV-1B SLAR configured aircraft as well as most of the OV-1C, I-R birds. In addition if I am not mistaken, a few of the C model aircraft were outfitted with the early T53-L-701 engines and designated "Super-C"

Thank you for allowing this correction.

Sincerely,
C.E. Sasser

I changed the engine for OV-1D according to this. --MarsRover 08:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

"Whispering Death"

I'm always skeptical of alleged nicknames like this given to US planes by the enemy. Yeah yeah, the enemy finds us scary and cool. Unless we can find a citation for it, I think we should drop it. As this site says, that nickname sounds like marketing hype. SkipSmith (talk) 06:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

I came to post talk about the same thing. I have found whispering and whistling death applied here to at least 6 planes including the P-38 and F-111. It has been attributed to Japanese, Germans, VC, NVA, and more. Always listing as "by certain enemies" but never with a good citation from anyone who has ever actually heard it call it that or someone who actually called it that. In this articles case the "citation" is just someone listing it as a nickname with no mention of why. Why would this name be attached to the OV-1 instead of the O-2 or better the OV-10 which was much more likely to carry arms. I highly doubt in the world of radar a plane thats made to loiter for 2 hours is going to sneak up on anyone.

Be Bold In Edits (talk) 18:52, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

I agree with the author of Whispering Death. I flew the Mohawk in VN and my guess is that the name was GI thing related to armed Mohawks compared to the other gunships that Army Aviation had over there: that being a armed Huey or a Cobra gunship. The helicopter gunships were very noisy and could be heard a long ways away. My opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by OV-1Guy (talk • contribs) 19:06, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Static Display

There is an additional example on static display at Dobbins ARB in Marietta, GA north of Atlanta. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.127.15.38 (talk) 21:19, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

The New Jersey Aviation Hall of Fame has an OV-1 on static display, but is not listed. http://www.njahof.org/exhibits.htm I don't know if that's enough documentation and I don't want to mess up the main article, so I'll leave it to an experienced wiki user. 72.76.203.102 (talk) 21:31, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Chief Auto Feather

Just a bit of Mohawk history that I don't see mentioned anywhere. The Mascot for the OV-1 Mohawk was known as "Chief Auto Feather" (a feature of the Hamilton Standard Propeller system). His as well as the OV-1'S birthday is celebrated as 14 April 1959.

Spc 4 67H10Q2B7 87-96  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sir wolf2001 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Other users

The article only provides info about use by the OV-1 by the US Army. Agree that it may have been the most important user, however other users (Israel, Argentina) should also have some info in this article. I'll expand with use by Argentine Army Aviation; in a first stage I'm adding the sources that I'll use to expand the article, and finally will edit the article with appropriate citations. Regards, DPdH (talk) 07:30, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

I'm still working on it, based on the sources I've already collected. Regards, DPdH (talk) 02:36, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Grumman OV-1 Mohawk/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Huey engines are not mounted vertically.207.118.3.189 03:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 01:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 16:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

New display of OV-1 at an art school.

I don't know how to edit but heres an article describing the display http://scpbc.blog.palmbeachpost.com/2017/08/15/vietnam-era-plane-being-towed-to-g-star-school-on-wednesday/ . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:582:8601:218:C27:49E4:6108:B90C (talk) 23:36, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Grumman OV-1 Mohawk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:15, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Grumman OV-1 Mohawk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:05, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Relation to the E-2 Hawkeye?

I don't have any books on the OV-1 or E-2 that might answer this, but is its design related to the E-2A Hawkeye? Both were developed by Grumman around the same time with the E2A looking like a scaled up version of the OV-1. If anyone has any information confirming this it might be an interesting addition to both pages. regards Mztourist (talk) 10:29, 30 July 2019 (UTC)