Talk:Gruinard Island

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Operation Dark Harvest[edit]

If anyone can find refs to it, it would be interesting to include "Operation Dark Harvest", where the SNLA claimed it had taken anthrax off the island, and was going to use it in biological attacks.--MacRusgail (talk) 17:54, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've found a Time Magazine article on it. Lurker (said · done) 11:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The area of the island is 520 acres but only about 16 acres were actually decontaminated; this was in the vicinity of where the anthrax air bomb was detonated. The actual method of application of the formaldehyde was applied using a complex matrix of irrigation pipes; the seawater was pumped up using Coventry Climax fire pumps and mixed with the formaldehyde using modified fertiliser injectors from greenhouse hydroponics set ups. As to Dark Harvest it sounds like a typical conspiracy theory; there would be a lot easier ways of obtaining anthrax spores than trying to cultivate them from spores obtained from the island. Certainly by the time the decontamination was carried out the spore level was very low, and within another dozen years they would have been virtually undetectable.

G maps[edit]

An anon IP writes: "Gruinard Island is deliberately blurred on Google Maps". It seems to be missing from G maps and of poor quality on Google Earth - but the same is true of nearby Pabay and probably co-incidental. It's not as if there is likely to be anything visible anyone might wish to obscure. Ben MacDui 17:50, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Two years later it's still very much low-res on Google Maps, as opposed to anything nearby. I think it's fair to say that this is not coincidentially. -- DevSolar (talk) 07:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you need more detail try Bing or Ordnance Survey. Ben MacDui 07:48, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Gruinard Island/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Listed as high due to its notoreity. --MacRusgail (talk) 22:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 16:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gruinard Island. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:47, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neither link works. The wayback link is to a GoDaddy expired account notice. I tried a couple of links on other dates in the wayback machine and found that this one works: https://web.archive.org/web/20080529042417/http://deepblade.net/journal/Holland_JUNE2005.pdf
Later versions may work as well. Some seemed to be PDF files but weren't loading, and I'm not at all sure that the files were actually there. -- motorfingers : Talk 23:14, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Dark Harvest[edit]

"...where the ruling Conservative Party was holding its annual conference." - Whilst the Conservatives may think they "rule", they but govern in the name of Queen Elizabeth II as only a monarch can rule in Great Britain.

92.11.135.180 (talk) 22:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Plagues and People[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2023 and 11 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cececason, Recordplayer88 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: JacobWhite28, BrightBuds, CrazELearning.

— Assignment last updated by MatthewBroadway (talk) 22:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]