Talk:Graphyne

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Graphyne article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Physics High‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

It should be merged.

Above statement is unsigned. I disagree with a merge. Graphynes are distinct from graphene (and carbon nanotubes, for example) in that they have different bond hybridization, and thus is a distinct carbon allotrope. Swc nice (talk) 01:30, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with a merge. Graphyne and graphene are two distinct allotropes of carbon. Graphynes can be mentioned in graphene section, but a seperate page should be dedicated to graphynes with appropriate links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.185.217.16 (talk) 00:16, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I Strongly disagree with merging. Graphynes are distinct materials with different mechanical and optical properties. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.179.65.8 (talk) 12:52, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Graphyne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121002073046/http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/03/graphyne-could-be-better-than-gr.html to http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/03/graphyne-could-be-better-than-gr.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:00, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Graphdiyne synthesized?[edit]

I checked reference 14 (the nature article "Homo-coupling of terminal alkynes on a noble metal surface"), and it doesn't claim the synthesis of graphdiyne. See figure 3, for example, where they show what they really synthesized: a dimer of 1,3,5-triethynyl-benzene, and in figure 5, polymers of 1,3,5-tris-(4-ethynylphenyl)benzene. Note that these still include hydrogen atoms, and are NOT a polymorph of carbon (meaning, only carbon). Also, it's not the same structure (only three carbon atoms of the six-ring connected, compared to all six for graphdiyne). Citing the conclusion of the paper: "This provides a new synthesis route towards conjugated molecular nanosystems and networks, providing potential for the fabrication of regular 1D scaffolds, such as carbyne40,41, 2D polymers, such as graphyne or graphdiyne6,42, and similar hydrocarbon membranes." I.e., they showed potential, not actual graphdiyne.

Unfortunately, reference 17 ("Study of carrier mobility of tubular and planar graphdiyne") is only a theoretical study, and the sentence "The construction of nanotubes of graphdiyne was reported few years ago[17]" is wrong.

I will remove these from the main article. —!nnovativ (talk) 08:36, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ref. 13 (Li et al., 2010, Architecture of graphdiyne nanoscale films) does explicitly mention graphdiyne synthesis and includes SEM, TEM, and AFM images. So perhaps the lede's "Although not yet synthesized" could be altered. --Ingafube (talk) 22:21, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]