Talk:Gran City Pop

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gran City Pop article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Latin music Low‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Gran City Pop[edit]

Is there an official source for the translation? Because the mix of languages makes it ambiguous. If it's English and Spanish words, using English grammar (i.e. adjective order) then it is "Great City Pop" as it is currently. But if the title is to be read with Spanish grammar (which despite being a native English speaker, I think seems more natural) then it would be "Great Pop City", which seems to conform more to the idea conveyed in the "Album information" section at the start. The imagery of a city on the cover also suggests the noun is "City" in the title, not "Pop". - ^Estoy_Aquí^{(t • c • e)} 14:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gran City Pop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100927203320/http://www.elrincondepaulina.es:80/spanish1/inicio.php? to http://www.elrincondepaulina.es/spanish1/inicio.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Astonish gap of sales reported[edit]

I don't wanna start an edit war with the user that made the sales change or get involved in a discussion. But it brought my attention the incredible jump from 300,000 to 1 million copies. With only 180,000 sales available that's a gap of more than 800,000 units. Honestly, seems this is not the case of many Latin albums of early 2000s or mid/late 90s which seems fine that gap or even 1 million and something (ofc, context also matters). By the way, I know the 300,000 units reported in the article press was about one month later it release but as a Spanish-album of late 2000s a gap of figures as high as 300-500K copies not seems bad if we made comparison with available sales, but more than that looks pretty high like we have here in the current version fo this article.

--Apoxyomenus (talk) 01:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Apoxyomenus: I agree with you and this link has been reversed previously. 1 million would be an ideal number to include in Ananda or Pau-Latina, but never for Gran City Pop, in 2009 sales were already too low for all artists, this affected Paulina too. To say that the disc sold 5 times more than the information we have about it, is really inflated, I will remove it immediately.--88marcus (talk) 03:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@88marcus: That's also applies to the Paulina Rubio discography, the 1 million mark needs to be reversed/changed again. While sales for Pau-Latina could be as high as 750,000 units e,g the 1 million for that album seems a big gap also with the available sales. Ananda could be easily have 1 million since have available 510,000 sales reported and that's not includes the download of 200,000 copies in Mexico making a total of 710,000/660,000 units. Thanks, --Apoxyomenus (talk) 03:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]