Talk:Goong (manhwa)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'm going to work on translating the names into Korean, if anyone notices any misspelling, please don't hesitate to correct it. :) Talchum 20:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Split[edit]

I finally have my hands on the first volume of this series. So far they have 18 released in Korea, so it's going to get long. I think we should make the "Books" section another article and post a link to it on the main page (Goong). Also, the characters' section needs to be split. Any comments/ suggestions? ~Hyakurei (talk) 20:13, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thats a good idea, but the character descriptions are really short so it doesn't matter —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.215.199.72 (talk) 03:54, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Against. The article needs serious clean up in line with wikipedia standards so it does not need to be split.--Hitsuji Kinno (talk) 15:26, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus for split. Instead, the article needs a cle4an and sourcing. SilkTork *YES! 22:48, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Goong (manhwa). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]