Talk:Go Missin'/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 15:38, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Info box

• Add a caption for the artwork

 Done

• The artwork has Diplo on it, is he a featured artist??

From all the articles I've read, he's only credited as the producer. Usher's SoundCloud page also doesn't list Diplo as a featured artist, for example, for "Lemme See" Rick Ross is mentioned in its title as featured.

• Genres should be in alphabetical order

 Done

• Remove the album, recorded and writer parameters, there's no point them being there

 Done

Lead

• "Go Missin'" is a song recorded by American singer Usher, produced by Diplo. Released on February 14, 2013 through SoundCloud as a free download, the track was released on Valentine's Day, as was the Diplo helmed "Climax", which was released as the lead single from Usher's seventh studio album, Looking 4 Myself (2012). → "Go Missin'" is a song recorded by American singer-songwriter Usher. It was produced by Diplo and was released on Valentine's Day 2013 through SoundCloud as a free download. The year before, Usher released "Climax" on Valentine's Day, the lead single from his seventh studio album, Looking 4 Myself (2012).

 Done

• The singer announced through his Twitter "You loved what I gave you last Valentine's #Climax So here is 'Special delivery from the cloud'Happy [sic] Valentine's Day!". → Prior to its release, the singer tweeted that he had a "special delivery from the cloud" for his fans as they liked how he released "Climax" on Valentine's Day the year before.

 Done

• critics → music critics

 Done

• , noting similar musical elements to "Climax". → This is repetition, you can remove it.

 Done

• Make the lead one paragraph, it's not long enough for two.

Hmmm, I don't know. The lead complies with WP:LEADLENGTH, and I feel like one paragraph just appears cluttered.

Critical response

• Brown described the tracks as to be → tracks? What other tracks?

 Done Removed plural.

• noted the collaboration as → described the collaboration as

 Done

• with the track containing → and thought that the track contained a

 Done

• though praised → though he praised

 Done

References

• These are perfect

Status

A pretty short article but it's well written. On hold for 7 days.  — AARON • ^TALK 12:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing, I've addressed your points, bar the last one for the lead. Et3rnal 16:58, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Okay. I personally think that the second one is too short and the lead looks sparser overall. Having it as one paragraph makes it look fuller. But I'll overlook it this time. Passing.  — AARON • ^TALK 23:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.