Talk:Ginger Snaps 2: Unleashed

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did this film make any money?[edit]

I saw the copious credits and wondered how this was financially possible? Did the investors/creditors ever see a return on investment?

The short answer is NO, it lost money hand over fist, as did the prequel.

The long answer is they got everyone to work for peanuts in the first place and filmed it very quickly , so got lots of people for very little money. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.115.191 (talk) 19:49, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is it to be assumed?[edit]

Is it to be assumed that the male werewolf in this movie is Ginger's love interest from the first film that was said to be "cured"?PokeHomsar (talk) 06:00, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's hinted, when B tells Ghost the werewolf came "from the suburbs", but not explicitly stated.

Cured? I don't remember that scene. You don't mean the guy who got infected by Ginger through sex, do you?ZFT (talk) 04:38, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I believe that is who they're referring to. His name was Jason McCardy. *Spoiler* Bridget shot him in the neck with a syringe of the monkshood extract when she came across him while on her way to intercept Ginger at the greenhouse Hallowe'en party. */spoilers* 86.175.202.14 (talk) 20:14, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost's Necklace[edit]

Ghost most likely took Bridget's necklace. 75.157.120.15 (talk) 07:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2003 & 2004?[edit]

The movie is catagorized as both a 2003 and 2004 movie. If that is indeed accurate, please explain the reason to me (and maybe add it to the article). — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZFT (talk • contribs) 22:59, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ginger Snaps 2: Unleashed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050922010324/http://www.telefilm.gc.ca/data/production/prod_2750.asp?lang=en&c=1 to http://www.telefilm.gc.ca/data/production/prod_2750.asp?lang=en&c=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:53, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]