Talk:Get in the Ring

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Get in the Ring article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Songs

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Guns N' Roses (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Guns N' Roses, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Guns N' RosesWikipedia:WikiProject Guns N' RosesTemplate:WikiProject Guns N' RosesGuns N' Roses articles

Lots of things missing here[edit]

September 13. 2006 Lot of things missing here that i would like to know about. Is it a live recording or studio with audience sound like they did with live like a suicide? If it is live; where was this recorded? and when? (KennyJ)

How can it be a live recording or a studio version with audience? It's on the Use Your Illusion II album so your questions don't make any sense. --Snkcube 10:38, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Listen to the song. It sounds like a concert, but they put audience sound on top of the studio recordings in Live like a Suicide. So i wonder: Is this song live or not? And if it is live, where was it recorded? 03:34 September 14 2006 (KennyJ)

For the last time, it's not live. --Snkcube 07:50, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have some facts to back that up? Cause i really like to know about it, and put it in the article. Because it´s important. 12:57 September 14 2006

It's more like the song had added audience sound. It wouldn't make sense to have one live song and the rest are studio tracks. --Snkcube 22:16, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just listen to the song, everything sounds identical to the rest of the album, it has overdubs, and all. The added crowd noise is to simulate a boxing game, or something (duh!).

What a rude, ill-mannered person. BaHaReep 06:29, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

^{[citation needed]}. Seriously, you're claiming a person replying to a stupid question is "rude" because they said "duh" on this fuckin' song?! Really? 2601:1C2:5000:1472:ACCE:F516:89A0:5C3F (talk) 14:14, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this as a separate article. This is an important song for this band and in general because so many people are directly criticised in it - very unusual. Robinson weijman 21:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I second a Keep - there's a lot to write about this one song. Craighennessey 22:41, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd third a Keep - it just came around on my media library shuffle and I caught some of the lyrics about music critics... first thing I did was a Wikipedia search. I'd have been disappointed if it was just a redirect to the album article. --YFB ¿ 03:21, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely Keep, i agree with the above commentSickboy3883 16:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I fifth the keep. Skeeker 22:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I sixth the keep. And if anyone disagrees; "Get in the ring motherfucker, and ill kick your bitchin little ass!" - Note to admins, this comment is intended as what normal people call 'humour'. Willy turner 07:57, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:GunsnRosesUseYourIllusionII.jpg[edit]

Image:GunsnRosesUseYourIllusionII.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]