Talk:German and Allied aircraft losses during Operation Bodenplatte

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on German and Allied aircraft losses during Operation Bodenplatte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081010131204/http://www.rcaf.com/439squadron/1a.htm to http://www.rcaf.com/439squadron/1a.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

aircraft losses[edit]

Where in this poorly written article can I find the bottom line losses without wading though a lot of tripe. 2.121.174.214 (talk) 00:56, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's absolutely unclear what the summary is. The article title talks about German and Allied aircraft losses. So, how many aircraft were lost by each side? Pranab (talk) 09:06, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A curious link[edit]

The link Baseplate appears to be rather curious in this context. Peter Horn User talk 01:30, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Background section[edit]

The whole Background section is pretty much incoherent. It is also so poorly written it is impossible to follow and draws conclusions not establish the background. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.86.117.208 (talk) 14:06, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]