Talk:Fujinoki Tomb

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I thought there would be more sources and information on this tomb but I didn't come across any that were more reputable than the Cambridge History. This is just a basic start. Please help it out if you can. Tortfeasor 05:04, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Skeleton in Japan's cupboard[edit]

The Observer newspaper of London reported under the heading above on 9th April 1989 that Japanese archaeologists had made the unsettling discovery that the Fujinoki tomb was of clear Korean origin. The tomb contained a nobleman's pointed, gilded bronze shoes with tiny rings, and gilt-bronze crown, which were almost identical to exhibits in the Korean national Museum in Seoul. They said this contradicted the official early history of Japan, which claimed the imperial dynasty dated back to the origin of the nation, and was not of Korean descent. Koreans were said to have claimed that investigation of ancient imperial tombs had been forbidden for fear of revealing those Korean origins. NRPanikker (talk) 14:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fujinoki Tomb. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]