Talk:Frontier Communications/Archives/2016

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Frontier Communications. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Information About the Company When it Was Citizens Utilities

check out these links they have more information:

http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/citizens-utilities-company-history/

-older history of the company when it was still citizens utilities

http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/history2/32/Citizens-Communications-Company.html

-more recent history of its divestment out of oil and how it became Frontier Communications

Remove old logo from page body. Deant frontier (talk) 14:24, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

 Not done. Historical logos are a valid inclusion in encyclopedic coverage of the subject. Please state why you think the old logo should be removed. And just because it's the old logo that the company doesn't want used anymore is not a valid reason. oknazevad (talk) 14:56, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


We appreciate your help in removing this from the page, as it is misleading to Wiki readers. Removing the logo will help improve the accuracy of the information contained in this page, as well as minimize confusion for your readers.

There is also no need for this logo placement to begin with (within the body content). The correct logo is displaying as it should, within the company summary box. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deant frontier (talkcontribs) 16:46, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Again, no. Historical logos, properly identified, are a matter of public interest. There is no inaccuracy in identifying a historical logo. The chances of confusion are slim. oknazevad (talk) 19:42, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Is there another editor or supervisor we can make this request to? We also do not understand why this instance of the logo even exists within the page section we are referring to (this logo placement is in the "Global Crossing and Commonwealth transactions" section of the article). The primary logo being displayed in the summary box is fine.

If there's an opportunity here to improve the quality and accuracy of content, I would imagine you would be open to that.

Thank you in advance for your continued consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deant frontier (talkcontribs) 18:07, 23 March 2016 (UTC)