Talk:Fraley v. Facebook, Inc.

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Reliable Sources...[edit]

Let's get some. The only possibly reliable source that I can see that refers to the subject of the article is the one from 9wsyr.com. The Register is about as reliable as a Papparazi rag. Scribd.com allows anyone to upload any PDF without any editorial or peer verification. WP:RS needs to be adhered to.--200.166.188.194 (talk) 11:24, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It'd be great if there was an official government website or a newspaper's official site somewhere that had the legal documents on the case on it, but I just checked and didn't find any, so this works out fine. I find it unlikely someone would upload pages of legal documents, and change something around to mess with us. Dream Focus 11:47, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's PACER, the N.D. Cal. page for which is at [1]. Registration is required; there is nominally a $0.10/page fee, but if you keep under $15 per calendar quarter, fees are waived and reset to zero for the next quarter. TJRC (talk) 22:12, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Update?[edit]

The last line of this article is future tense about two years ago, the page should be updated with the results of the case. I would do it myself but I'm too lazy to Google for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bumblebritches57 (talk • contribs) 10:12, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the footnote reference in the last line about the $15 settlement checks links to this very same article as proof of its veracity. Nice.— Preceding unsigned comment added by DaveDecot (talk • contribs) 03:56, 13 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.2.26.231 (talk) [reply]

Removing COI template[edit]

I'm removing] the {{COI}} that I placed there in 2013. The basis for it was that a plaintiff's attorney on the case, Jonathan.Jaffe, had been editing this article to promote himself and his involvement. He's been quiet for the last few years, though, so I think it can be removed. TJRC (talk) 19:28, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]