Talk:Forks (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Forks are better than knives. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.247.168.183 (talk) 00:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 04:03, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Forks → Forks (disambiguation) – Move to redirect to Fork, the clear primary topic per WP:PLURALPT. Small physical objects that often come in sets and are even used in multiples in table settings. bd2412 T 16:03, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose - In this case I think people looking for the geographical locations (maybe just because of Twilight) are just as likely to search the plural name, to the extent that a dab page makes sense.--Yaksar (let's chat) 18:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tentative support in trust that effective links will be made to the disam pages. Many items on Fork (disambiguation) many be searched for by someone typing "forks". Gregkaye ✍♪ 09:04, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- That could be accomplished with a hatnote saying:

How does that strike you? bd2412 T 13:42, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Yaksar. The Forks, Washington page alone gets more than 50% the views of the Fork page, which is well more than what we would expect for a typical plurally titled topic. Dohn joe (talk) 14:43, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support with a concession--definitely, the city should be individually listed in the hatnote at Fork. Yes, many people will search for the town under Forks; upon arriving at the page on forks, they will think "oh, duh" and click on that link and be on their way. Red Slash 04:07, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, delete this disambiguation page and merge it to the singular (Fork (disambiguation)). Red Slash 01:48, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Disagree... We have three DABS at present, this one, Fork (disambiguation) and The Forks, and it's a good setup. Andrewa (talk) 12:45, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Clear primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:49, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Clear primary topic. Andrewa (talk) 12:45, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support, forks = forks. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:46, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.