Talk:Focke-Wulf Ta 283

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Focke-Wulf Ta 283 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Germany Stub‑class

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 15 February 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. No prospect of consensus to move. I also note that this and similar nominations based on one particular reference, that of Dan Sharp, seem to have no basis according to our article naming policy. Andrewa (talk) 08:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Focke-Wulf Ta 283 → Focke-Wulf Strahlrohrjäger – Dan Sharp's book Secret Projects of the Luftwaffe: Jet Fighters 1939-1945 notes that the designation "Ta 283" cited for the Focke-Wulf Strahlrohrjäger is a fictitious designation invented by aviation historians in the post-WW2 period derived from drawing Nr. 283 for the Strahlrohrjäger. Thus, the Strahlrohrjäger never received an RLM designation. Convariety (talk) 03:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Ta 283 seems to be the WP:COMMONNAME in reliable, English-language sources. Sharp's book seems to be the only one that uses the proposed name. (t · c) buidhe 04:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:52, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.