Talk:Flight call

Birds Low‑importance

Flight call is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Prod? Richard001 (talk) 08:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

question[edit]

Does this "article" even deserves to exist on Wikipedia? --aad_Dira (talk) 07:52, 17 June 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Can you provide us with any reason, even just one, why it shouldn't? It may be a stub – perhaps even short by stub standards – but though short it defines something that both actually exists and has been noted by researchers in the relevant field (ornithology); for long enough (and without challenge) that basic information about it occurs even in secondary sources such as the one cited. Why, pray tell, does this article not deserve to exist on Wikipedia (a free encyclopaedia, the goal of which is ultimately to be a repository of all reliable human knowledge)? Heather Elke (talk) 20:01, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]