Talk:Fjord

Geology High‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Fjord is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Glaciers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glaciers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Glaciers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlaciersWikipedia:WikiProject GlaciersTemplate:WikiProject GlaciersGlacier articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Fyord[edit]

No-one spells it fyord. Fyord doesn't even redirect here. This book cited in the article says: "The OED gives precedence to fi-. The other spelling is apparently used in English to help the ignorant to call it fyord; as, instead of helping, it only puzzles them, it should be abandoned". Clearly that means that in the 1920s the OED actually considered the fiord spelling to be the standard and the author notes the word was being incorrectly pronounced as fyord (due to a mistaken sight reading of fjord), not spelled as fyord. Fiord should be bolded as the article redirects here. --81.158.79.21 (talk) 13:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what your suggestion is here. Fyord isn't even mentioned in the article. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 19:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fjord in Maine[edit]

According to Your Guide to the National Parks, “The park and Island are nearly split in half by a natural, glacially-carves barrier, Somes Sound. It is the only fjord on the U.S. Atlantic Coast.” 217.180.228.133 (talk) 13:12, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bbnnkjk[edit]

Nhc M@8øfhvv yn n c 37.221.245.243 (talk) 20:03, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

split article into two[edit]

This article refers to a general geographic term but also goes in depth to fjords of Norway. Presumably because that is the nation inventing the term. However it is confusing when this page is linked (for example freshwater fjords from lake Okanagan from ogopogo) and it's all about Norway instead of general land shapes. I therefore propose we have 2 articles: one about physical geography and one about the Norwegian context. Sound reasonable? Rusl (talk) 10:31, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]