Talk:Fitzroy Bridge

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 7 May 2018 by reviewer MatthewVanitas (talk · contribs).

Australia: Queensland Low‑importance

	Australia portal Fitzroy Bridge is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

title naming[edit]

the replacement has an awkward title which could be Fitzroy Bridge 1952 making this Fitzroy Bridge 1881 but then there is also a bridge or two in Goulburn meaning an even more longform name including suburbs
should we ? Dave Rave (talk) 22:26, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

so perhaps a disam page could start with

* Fitzroy Bridge, Rockhampton (1881)
* Fitzroy Bridge, Rockhampton (1952)
* Fitzroy Bridge, Goulburn (1854)
* Fitzroy Bridge, Goulburn (1884)
* Fitzroy Bridge, Goulburn (later still)
* Fitzroy Bridge, Windsor

though I'd be happy with just three pages and multiple infoboxes
Dave Rave (talk) 22:45, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]