Talk:First Leicester

Fares[edit]

Is there any good rational for having a complete run down of First Leicester's tickets (along with pricing and availability) on this page? This is a encyclopaedia article on First Leicester; the company, not First Leicester; special offers this month. It's not here to replicate information that properly belongs on their company website. I'd consider all this information (other than maybe the briefest of mentions) as un-encyclopaedic and advertising, besides being uncited. Wikipedia is not a travel brochure. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 23:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In a word, no. Further information for the IP editor currently re-adding it can be found at WP:UKBQDRIVE. MickMacNee (talk) 13:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where do the fares need to go ? If i can find them all out do i post them here on the article? Do they need to be in a table ? Stewiewispa (talk) 12:58, 08 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fares should not be added to the article at all. See WP:NOT. Jenuk1985 | Talk 13:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

in my view fares SHOULD be added to the article or somewere within these pages. Stewiewispa (talk) 13:18, 08 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a travel guide. If you want to publish fares, I'd suggest starting your own website, there are many free hosting providers out there. Jenuk1985 | Talk 13:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok but i still think as other some other users would do that fares even just multijourney tickets such as day week month savers Stewiewispa (talk) 12:58, 08 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First's website has all the infomation you'll ever need on fares. So we don't need it. Arriva436^{talk/contribs} 13:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok i will leave it as it then. Stewiewispa (talk) 12:58, 08 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Route Table[edit]

Thank you to msalmon who fixed my error earlier other info could be added to this page or even to the article at the bottom if anybody has any suggestions please talk ">stewiewispa (Talk)

No problem, I just want to keep it as a standardised route table, without any major changes Msalmon (talk) 17:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership[edit]

According to [1], First only own 94% of Leicester Citybus Ltd. I wonder who owns the remaining 6%? Can't find anything. May be worth putting in if we find out. Morwen - Talk 23:25, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]