Talk:Final Resolution (January 2008)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Final Resolution (January 2008) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Final Resolution (January 2008) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 19, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	Final Resolution (January 2008) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Professional wrestling#Disqualification|disqualified]] The anchor (#Disqualification) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Facebuster#Leaping reverse STO|Straight to Hell]] The anchor (#Leaping reverse STO) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Final Resolution (January 2008)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 00:29, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article shortly. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 00:29, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And so another review by Wizardman on an article I wrote. "So...we meet again." I've done a copyedit of the article as soon as I saw this page was created. Hopefully it will help solve any issues you find. I found a bunch of stuff I missed when I nominated it.--WillC 08:13, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, tackling the top end of the sports backlog now that I finally have time to do so; since it's mainly your stuff I'll probably do antoher one or two.

I hope to be doing the same very shortly. The sports backlog is always extremely long. I hope to get involved in reviewing some to keep it shorter. Maybe under 20 or 15 articles at a time. I plan to nominate plenty this next coming year so I might as well do my part.--WillC 01:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here's what I found:

"TNA created a section regrading their event" regarding
- O_0 What the hell? How did I screw that up? Fixed--WillC 01:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"TNA held a second Final Resolution event in December 2008 due to unknown reasons.[5]" I'd reword to have it say that TNA moved Final Revolution to December rather than January, since it makes the unknown reasons part pop a lot more.
- Rewrote, that good enough?--WillC 01:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"However, before the encounter and it" rm and
- Fixed--WillC 01:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"which the later lost." latter
- Fixed--WillC 01:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"around the sametime," same time
- Fixed--WillC 01:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"While due to Team 3D's creativity in the Ultimate X match they "stole the show in a match they had no business being in."" Reword a bit; it feels like it's missing a piece as is and is a fragment.
- Worked on it, hope that fixes the issue.--WillC 01:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put the article on hold and will pass it when this is fixed. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 17:25, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks good now, so I'll pass the article as a GA. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:49, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

kaz/black reign[edit]

Wasn't the kaz black reign match a four corners mouse/mousetrap on a pole match? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.94.251.19 (talk) 21:41, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Final Resolution (January 2008). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6LDla2zy5?url=http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/pro-wrestling.htm to http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/pro-wrestling.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]