Talk:Fenty Beauty/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lingzhi2 (talk · contribs) 11:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You've been waiting for a while. I'll review this soon. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 11:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The "In popular culture" section is completely unreferenced and by all rights should be deleted. I'll give you some time to find refs.
Please delete all the other things that won awards, as listed in the awards section. Something about NASA and so on. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 15:59, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"drawn international praise for the range of shades offered,[19][20][21][22][23]" and "drew broad enthusiasm.[31][32][33][34][35]". You can't make a broad statement and then back it up by giving many specific examples. That's kinda approaching WP:OR. What you need is to find sources that say what you said... This is also WP:OVERCITE, but the former is a policy (which makes it mandatory), while the latter is an essay (which sorta kinda probably makes it recommended, esp. depending on how much cachet that essay carries). ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 06:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You've got some really high percentages on Earwig's Copyvio Detector. You can use WP:BLAME and The Wayback Machine to show that others copied from Wikipedia instead of vice versa. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 07:29, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Update: Eh? When I posted this two days ago there were some websites with > 70% match; now they are not listed. I dunno if someone added them to an exclusion list, or...what... ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 10:43, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fail GAN lack of response. Pinged WikiProject also, still no response. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 23:16, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]