Talk:Felix Römer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleFelix Römer has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 12, 2018Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 17, 2018.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that historian Felix Römer found that 116 of 137 German World War II combat divisions he researched implemented the Commissar Order, contrary to postwar denials?

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Felix Römer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Catrìona (talk · contribs) 08:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I'll take a look at this article as well. Catrìona (talk) 22:41, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • were murdered by regular troops (not the SS) by May 1942 Recommend alternate phrasing, and clarify that they were shot after surrender was accepted. Perhaps "... were shot by Wehrmacht (not SS) units after their surrender was accepted." The emphasis on not the SS comes across as slightly POV.
Revised. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:03, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • sporadic objections to the order were not fundamental I think this could be clarified. By "fundamental" you mean "in principle", "principled", "humanitarian" or due to respect for the rule of law, but I'm not sure which.
Revised. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:03, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • believed in a victory for even longer is "even" necessary here?
Removed. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:03, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fix harv errors with Staas and Romer, classified as unused sources.
Moved to further reading. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:03, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed