This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Is there a real need for this page at all? FVWM-Crystal is just a set of configs; it ought not to need singling out in the manner. If it is *really* necessary, a mention about it can put on the FVWM page. -- ThomasAdam (2007/10.17)
The scope of the FVWM-Crystal project differs from FVWM, of course; it may be regarded as an outflow of the latter. Most important: it enhances the bare window manager FVWM with applicability and it points out ways how to get it applicable in other contexts if the used methods are transfered onto other apps! A.Abdel-Rahim (talk) 23:11, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is a freakin' advertisement!
Why the hell doesn't Wikipedia have some kind of vetting process for new articles? I was looking for a description, not a puff-piece. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.65.209.117 (talk) 11:45, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not absurd anymore: in the time span between August 2009 and February 2010 the text has undergone a lot of significant improvements, resulting in a higher level of quality. Nevertheless it may be somewhat short; on the other hand the article has got a more precise formulation now. All in all, the shortness does not affect this encyclopaedia in a negative way, because encyclopaedia articles ought to be concise. It's not a stub anymore; moreover it's self-contained and short. A.Abdel-Rahim (talk) 23:11, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
