Talk:Essentra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copy[edit]

I am very new to Wikipedia, and have today found that my new entry is on the deletion list.

Can anyone tell me how I can improve the text so that it can stay on the site?

Thanks

--APR69 14:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, then. It's not about the text itself, it's about the company. You should demonstrate that it meets the criteria set in WP:CORP. --Nehwyn 15:24, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your help. I have referenced the company via the use of a link to the FSTE 250. How do I ensure that this is enough to comply with Wiki and if so how do I take off the deletion list? --APR69 10:13, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the prod tag and added cleanup tags instead - this article needs a lot of work to bring it up to encyclopedia standard. --Casper2k3 11:06, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A FSTE250 reference is enough to avoid deletion, as you have seen. Still, Casper2k3 is right in saying that this article is below standards, and still reads like an advert, not an encyclopaedia entry. A list of product is probably not appropriate, while the history of the company (given the "since 1911" claim) would be appreciated. --Nehwyn 12:59, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have drastically cut down this article to improve its quality and remove the advert tag. It read just like an advert. If you wish to reintroduce some of the removed material, please ensure it is encyclopaedic and does not read like a promotional brochure. Thanks. Akihabara 04:23, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a notability tag since this company is part of a FTSE-250 company; it is not a FTSE-250 company itself. Please indicate notability for this company, or it may be nominated for deletion again in the future. Akihabara 04:35, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move[edit]

The company (Payne Security) in this article does not seem to be notable: No secondary sources have been given, and none added since more than half a year. However, the parent company, Filtrona PLC, is probably notable since it is listed in the FTSE 250. I will therefore convert this article to one about the parent company, which will include the current content. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 17:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger of Filtrona Porous Technologies[edit]

Agree with the merger proposal. This article alone has had difficulties WRT notability. Combining the two would beef both up. --rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid (coṁrá) 20:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed and Filtrona Porous Technologies should be deleted Dormskirk (talk) 17:45, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Essentra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Essentra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:49, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Essentra&oldid=1207138419"