Talk:Eric Williams (defensive lineman)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

College football Low‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

National Football League Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Washington Commanders

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Washington Commanders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Washington Commanders and the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Washington CommandersWikipedia:WikiProject National Football League/Washington Commanders subprojectTemplate:WikiProject Washington CommandersWashington Commanders articles

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 15:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot (talk) 18:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Miraculous birth??[edit]

This article has one of the most marvelous mistakes I have ever seen on Wikipedia.

In the infobox, it says

"Date of birth: February 24, 1962 (age 46)"

and I am quoting (as of Tuesday, August 19, 2008).

A miracle beyond compare! A man born at the age of 46!

So I added a "dubious" flag. Somebody needs to fix the infobox to have it say "Current age..." or, better, "Age as of 2008..." where the template should fill in current year with 2008 (or whatever the current year may be). Frankly, though, I don't know why readers can't subtract 1962 from 2008 (or whatever the current year is) to get this man's age all by themselves.

Timothy Perper (talk) 20:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, while I admit it is a bit misleading, it is consistent across the board for the person infoboxes. Perhaps it is something that should be raised on the infobox talk page instead, since it is the infobox that formats that line from the date of birth. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 11:00, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's misleading. I don't care about the "dubious" tag -- it's not dubious that 2008-1962=46 -- but whether or not it's consistent across person infoboxes doesn't really matter. What does matter is that it's careless and imprecise, just the kind of thing that Wiki abounds in (despite the efforts of well-meaning editors). I'm not going to tilt at windmills and find the "infobox talk page" to start a discussion that will only produce endless arguments. So I've made my point, and that's enough for now. Timothy Perper (talk) 13:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well fair enough, but the point you made to a tiny minority here was rendered null and void, as the issue could not be fixed here without fixing it everywhere. Sometimes getting a meaningful change to happen requires a bit of effort and it's a bit of a defeatist attitude to assume nothing will happen. You never know, sometimes the Wiki community does see common sense. ;-) Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 15:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, maybe it couldn't be fixed here. That was not something I knew. And I still don't know what the infobox talk page is, which you mentioned before. If you think I'm lazy, come over and look at the manga talk page, which I patrol regularly. Defeatist I ain't. But I can't fix what I don't know about. So I started here, and that at least brought you and me into contact, which is a start. Do you disagree? Timothy Perper (talk) 17:41, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]