Talk:Entner–Doudoroff pathway

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Phosphoric acid#Orthophosphoric acid chemistry|hydrogen phosphate]] The anchor (#Orthophosphoric acid chemistry) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jnobles1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Error in Figure[edit]

The reaction from GAP to pyruvate does not cost 2 ATP but leads to the formation of 2 ATP. Perhaps someone can correct this? 13:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Willem —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.121.120.73 (talk)

The only thing needed to correct it is to change "2 ADP" for "2 ATP" and vice-versa? Khullah (talk) 01:56, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DoneShanghai killer whale (talk) 14:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edits of 4 August[edit]

I came here fore a quick check as to a particular fact about the pathway, and found the article written at a college level, at best, and inaccurate for its gross omissions. I chose three reviews that might help editors, adding them as "Further reading," and cleaned up the references as I could, time permitting. (The Bergey's citation did not mention Bergey's (the actual book name), or the article authors, etc., etc. In addition, some all caps, etc., dealt with.)

The matter of the articles using Bergey's (a good secondary source) for Rhizobium, then resorting to the primary literature is questioned, in an in-markup note, and here, and via tags. There is no reason to use primary sources for a basic biochemistry article such as this—review material abounds (see the complete Bergey's indices, and the new "Further reading" material for a start).

Because of the gross absence of material on the archaebacterial use of variants of this pathway, and because the generalizations made are superficial and significantly inaccurate—undergraduate textbook level, and dated at that—I have added the "Expert-subject" tag, for a career BS/MS microbiologist (or even a PhD level), to capture the modern and nuances aspects (Molecular and Cellular Biology was the Wikiproject called out). The omission of the archaes means many relevant genera do not appear, phylogenetic matters are confounded, etc.

I have marked some statements needing citation, and some dubious statements, but leave the rest to the expert.

Please do not remove the tags to make an article look better; readers deserve knowing that they are being shown an incomplete, and significantly inaccurate science article. Le Prof. 71.201.62.200 (talk) 05:33, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Entner–Doudoroff pathway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]