This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
In researching the classification of Enhydrocyon @ PaleoDB[1] it shows no association with Hesperocyon. The authority used within this article, X. Wang, is also a contributing researcher for the PaleoDB.Noles1984 (talk) 22:28, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In Dogs: Their Fossil Relatives & Evolutionary History, also by X. Wang, unequivocally states that Enhydrocyon is a hesperocyonid.--Mr Fink (talk) 02:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, I find PaleoDB rather questionable as a source, given as how the list of "sister genera" not only includes Hesperocyon, but also a random grab bag of random canid genera.--Mr Fink (talk) 02:14, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
_part_2.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
