Talk:Energy homeostasis

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Energy homeostasis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biology Mid‑importance

	Biology portal Energy homeostasis is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:44, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Energy balance (biology) → Energy homeostasis – To continue from User_talk:Smartse#WP_chat_conversation, it would be better to have it renamed. After all, it is already a fork from Human homeostasis (Human_homeostasis#Energy). --Relisted. ^walk victor falk^talk 05:00, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:07, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious support altogether more encyclopedic title, more wp:precise and more wp: concise (usually those two are by nature in inherent conflict), superfluous parenthesis by wp:naturaldis. Almost a perfect school example on how not to title an article. ^walk victor falk^talk 05:00, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support move. Coreyemotela (talk) 19:41, 21 May 2014 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.