Talk:Employment in Hong Kong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neutrality of the article[edit]

Hong Kong is certainly a place with rights for employees but the way this article was written looks more like a government's brochure.

That's because its' an almost complete lift from [1]. Luke! 07:25, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No copyvio, so I removed from WP:CP. Horribly POV though. --Ars Scriptor 16:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I'm pretty sure we're not supposed to copy documents verbatim into articles. Although there's no copyright infringement, using a single source to write an article is still plagiarism. Also, there's not much point linking to the source document as it's pretty much the same thing. Also, there is a POV problem though as this only represents the POV of the government.--Chuckygobyebye 08:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WP:PLAG Tavatar (talk) 18:58, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use of $[edit]

The symbol $ is used to describe GDP and wages without any reference to which country's dollars are being used. Is it to be assumed that $ in the GDP section refers to USD and $ in the wages section refers to HKD?

I dont agree all values should be in local currency with an exchange rate value in brackets. Enlil Ninlil 05:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updates[edit]

I updated the Overview paragraph, and deleted a paragraph from Employment Distribution (also updated) on income disparity as unrelated to the subject. Deleted paragraph: However, like many developed nations Hong Kong also faces a problem of income disparity. Though the accuracy of the Gini coefficient has been called into question, it does give an estimate of income inequality. According to World Bank statistics, in 2003 Hong Kong was at 0.52 which put it on the same level as Mexico or Russia.

I also updated the Wages section.DOR (HK) (talk) 08:48, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Abercrombie & Fitch: Hiring for Looks[edit]

1.Why would Abercrombie & Fitch want to hire employees with a certain look?

2.From a business perspective, do you think this is a good idea? What about from an ethical perspective or a legal perspective? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.214.222.171 (talk) 07:40, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Employment in Hong Kong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Employment_in_Hong_Kong&oldid=1201750969"