Talk:EmDrive/Archive 9
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 |
Requested move 1 April 2021
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Primefac (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
EmDrive → RF resonant cavity thruster – Article covers both the EmDrive and the Cannae drive, so its title should reflect the generic name for such devices. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:37, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. According to this the names are synonyms. The page was moved to its current name per WP:COMMONNAME so it should stay unless there is evidence to the contrary. Vpab15 (talk) 16:14, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Ahecht belatedly: I supported this previously, but as there's no such thing as a [resonant cavity thruster] and it's been thoroughly demonstrated not to work - and most of the promotion and adoption and trademark mania was around this name - I think it's fine to leave it at EmDrive for the record, and even to remove that bolded phrase from the title.
- We can probably remove the redirects from 'impossible drive' however, as this was not the first and won't be the last concept to get that moniker. – SJ + 21:24, 10 December 2021 (UTC)